The A.M. Dispatch
The A.M. Dispatch
Edition For - January 7th, 2024: DISARM Files Continued, Voter Fraud, January 6th Provocateurs, and Trump's Legal Battles
Welcome to the America Mission Dispatch.
Our Digital Newspaper.
We welcome any feedback to make your experience more enjoyable.
Send any feedback to Editor@WCdispatch.com
DISPATCH DIRECTORY
FEATURED: AMERICA MISSION INVESTIGATIONS
POLITICS:
Whistleblowers and Forensic Audits Reveal Extensive Voter Fraud Scheme that Swung 2020 Election
The Sinister Truth Behind January 6: Unmasking the Federal Provocateurs
LAW:
Veterans Demand Accountability: Military Whistleblowers Call Out Unlawful Vaccine Mandates
House Democrats' Calculated Attack: The Scheme to Disqualify Justice Thomas
Jack Smith: The Brazen Disregard for Legal Procedure in Trump Prosecution
OPINION:
America Mission Investigations
DISARM Files, “Incident Reports”: Conservative Figures Labeled as Disinformation Agents
January 6th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
In the ongoing DISARM investigation conducted by America Mission, a series of newly unearthed documents showing "Disinformation Incidents" that have shockingly categorized prominent conservative figures alongside Russian agents and the Internet Research Agency (IRA).
These documents delve into the aftermath of Christine Blasey Ford's allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. In an alarming twist, the 'Incident Report' indiscriminately labels notable conservative voices as part of what it calls "the sewers of the modern far-right disinformation metropolis." Among those unjustly branded in this manner are Roger Stone, referred to as a "dandified Republican rogue and likely Mueller investigee," along with his “protégés“ Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec.
Alex Jones, known for his work with Infowars, is derogatorily described as "the breathless Infowars conspiracist-in-chief." Additionally, Chuck Johnson, identified as an "alt-right super-troll," is implied to have played a role in the Kavanaugh "scandal."
The report doesn't stop there. It also targets the Daily Wire, focusing on the significant engagement their coverage received. One of their top stories about the Kavanaugh confirmation, headlined “Prosecutor Who Questioned Ford Shreds Her Case In Five-Page Memo,” generated over 205,000 engagements. Another article, featuring Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick and her criticism of the Democrats' double standards, received nearly 180,000 engagements.
DISARM's approach in this report is deeply concerning. It equates the legitimate actions and commentary of these American figures with those of foreign disinformation agents. Their involvement in reporting and commenting on the Kavanaugh-Ford case is portrayed as part of a larger disinformation campaign, erroneously aligning them with Russian state actors and the IRA.
This problematic association forms a critical part of DISARM's narrative. It unjustly frames these conservative commentators as equivalent to foreign agents, thereby seemingly justifying the use of military-grade cyber warfare tactics against them. This tactic mirrors those detailed by journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger in the CTIL Files, exposing the disturbing extent of the censorship industrial complex.
This report represents only a fraction of the new documents that America Mission plans to release as part of its continued investigation into this complex web of censorship and misinformation. As more information comes to light, the true scale and implications of these findings promise to be both revealing and deeply concerning for the state of free speech and political discourse in America. Stay tuned to America Mission for further updates in this critical investigative series.
Return To Directory
POLITICS
Whistleblowers and Forensic Audits Reveal Extensive Voter Fraud Scheme that Swung 2020 Election
January 5th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
New evidence has emerged, presenting a damning picture of extensive voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election. The epicenter of this electoral catastrophe? Georgia, a state now synonymous with the corruption and manipulation that plagued this election. This trove of data, dumped into the public domain by former President Trump’s team, has flung open the doors, exposing how key swing states, including Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, were compromised.
The Report
The revelations from Georgia are nothing short of incredible. Over a million absentee ballots were mysteriously ordered just days before the election in Fulton County, despite a glaring discrepancy with the number of active registered voters. This situation reeks of corruption, especially as it becomes evident that these ballots, printed in none other than Maricopa County, Arizona, were dispatched without corresponding voter registration requests.
These ballots were found to be in pristine condition, marked exclusively for Biden and lacking votes for down-ballot candidates. Such an anomaly starkly defies typical voting patterns and suggests a deliberate, coordinated effort to artificially inflate the vote count for a single candidate. Furthermore, the chain of custody for these ballots was reportedly breached, with evidence of ballots being counted multiple times. This violation of procedural norms not only casts doubt on the authenticity of the count but also undermines the integrity of the entire electoral process.
The role of Dominion voting machines in Georgia has also come under scrutiny. Allegations of QR code mismatches and configuration errors in logs across 65 of Georgia's 67 counties have emerged, alongside concerns about the security of tabulators and memory cards used in these machines. Election integrity experts like Robert Bowers have highlighted the vulnerability of these systems to manipulation, pointing to technical issues such as double scanning of ballots without observer oversight.
Another RINO
The situation in Georgia is further complicated by Governor Brian Kemp's response to these allegations. Despite being presented with substantial evidence of irregularities, Kemp's reaction has been criticized as inadequate and dismissive. His administration's attempts to shift the blame onto Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, while Kemp himself had direct access to this information, have been perceived as a deflection from his own responsibilities in ensuring a fair and transparent election process.
Whistleblowers in Georgia, notably Ruby Freeman, have bravely reported serious irregularities in the 2020 election, only to face daunting intimidation efforts by the FBI. Their testimonies align with the findings of Joseph Rossi, a civilian election integrity advocate whose independent audit in November 2021 unveiled alarming anomalies in Georgia's voting process. Rossi's investigation revealed over 4,000 false votes for Joe Biden in Fulton County's hand count, a discrepancy acknowledged by both Governor Brian Kemp's office and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's investigators, yet these votes disturbingly remained in the official count.
Rossi's audit further highlighted that correcting these false votes would drastically reduce Biden's victory margin to around 7,690 votes. The audit also noted missing 17,852 votes compared to the original machine count totals. Rossi's findings suggest a cover-up by the Secretary of State, who may have pressured counties into certifying results without adequate transparency. The planned comprehensive audit by Kemp’s office on December 18th, which could have addressed these issues, notably never took place, raising serious concerns about the commitment to election integrity in Georgia.
Legal Battle Continue
The battle for election integrity is gaining traction, with organizations like True the Vote at the forefront of legal efforts to address the 2020 election irregularities. Their unwavering pursuit of justice has yielded significant victories, particularly in Georgia, where they have been instrumental in challenging questionable electoral practices. As more information surfaces from Georgia and other states, the urgency for electoral reform intensifies, underscoring the need for measures like same-day voting to bolster the integrity of our voting systems and restore public confidence in the democratic process.
In a landmark ruling against Stacy Abrams' Fair Fight, legal teams led by Marc Elias, and the Biden Department of Justice, the federal court in the Northern District of Georgia affirmed the constitutional rights of citizens to petition their government for election integrity. This legal triumph, a testament to the tenacity of True the Vote, supported Georgia citizens in challenging the eligibility of over 364,000 voters due to residency issues. The court's decision, hailed as a complete defense verdict for True the Vote, vindicates their actions and reinforces the use of Section 230 eligibility challenges as a crucial tool for maintaining accurate voter rolls. This victory, celebrated by True the Vote President Catherine Engelbrecht and attorney Jake Evans, marks a pivotal moment in safeguarding free speech and active citizen participation in the electoral process.
Vote in 2024
In conclusion, the 2020 election stands as a stark reminder of the threats our country is facing. It's a call to action for every American who values their right to a fair and just electoral system. The revelations of fraud and corruption must not dishearten us; rather, they should ignite a fire of determination and resolve. This is not the end but the beginning of a crucial fight for the soul of our nation. Your vote matters now more than ever. The only way to combat this level of fraud is to overwhelm it with sheer numbers, with unyielding commitment to participating in the process.
Now is the time to get involved, to become an active participant in shaping the future of our country. Register to vote, educate yourself on the issues, and be a voice in your community. Encourage others to do the same. We have the power to change the course of history, to ensure that the values of integrity, transparency, and fairness are upheld in every election. Let's stand together, united in our pursuit of truth and justice, and show that the spirit of American democracy will not be subdued. Start today – for the future of our great nation rests in our hands.
Return To Directory
The Sinister Truth Behind January 6: Unmasking the Federal Provocateurs
January 6th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
As the third anniversary of January 6th passes, explosive new evidence shatters the narrative we've been fed, exposing a chilling tale of political manipulation and federal infiltration. The unsettling revelations about Ray Epps and Mike Dunn, and the lackadaisical approach of the FBI, paint a picture of a sinister plot, orchestrated by embedded operatives with deep political ties, to incite violence and chaos at the Capitol.
Ray Epps: The Instigator with Democratic Connections and FBI Leniency
Ray Epps, the man infamously captured on video urging crowds to enter the Capitol building on January 5th and 6th, has become a central figure in the controversy surrounding the events of January 6th. Recently obtained FBI documents through FOIA requests have shed light on a startling lack of investigation into Epps’ actions. Despite the clear evidence of his involvement in instigating the breach, the FBI documents reveal an early decision against prosecuting him, dismissing any potential case as a "non-starter." This revelation raises profound questions about the agency's impartiality and the motives behind their selective enforcement.
The FBI’s seemingly preferential treatment of Epps is further underscored by his swift removal from the FBI’s most-wanted list, merely two days after being added. This removal occurred after Epps himself questioned his presence on the list, leading to a puzzling absence of charges against him. Intriguingly, documents submitted by Epps' own defense attorneys, as part of his criminal case, included these FBI files to argue against his prosecution, citing the FBI’s earlier decision to clear him. This stark contrast in the FBI’s aggressive pursuit and charging of other January 6th defendants, juxtaposed with their leniency, unveils a disturbing discrepancy that clearly shows Epps’ prior ties to the FBI.
Mike Dunn: The Unprosecuted Instigator of January 6th
Mike Dunn, leader of the extremist group "Boogaloo bois," is shrouded in controversy due to his documented involvement in the January 6th Capitol breach. Notably captured on video forcefully entering the Capitol's western doors, Dunn and his group "The Last Sons of Liberty" boldly claimed responsibility for playing a key role in the day's violence. Despite these brazen admissions and tangible evidence of his participation, Dunn astonishingly evaded arrest, raising serious questions about the selective enforcement and potential complicity of federal agencies.
Dunn's subsequent disappearance following the riot, only to reemerge ready to fight in Ukraine, adds a layer of mystery to his already suspect narrative. His earlier admission of working as an FBI agent while leading "Boogaloo bois" suggests a deeper level of involvement and potential orchestration by federal entities. This glaring lack of accountability and transparency surrounding Dunn's actions and affiliations necessitates a rigorous investigation to unveil the true extent of federal involvement and ensure justice is served for the orchestrated chaos of January 6th.
As we piece together these disturbing revelations, it's becoming increasingly clear that January 6th was not just a spontaneous riot but a carefully orchestrated event with deep political underpinnings. The involvement of federal agents and operatives in stoking the fires of chaos and violence raises alarming questions about the integrity of our institutions and the lengths to which political actors will go to manipulate public perception and achieve their goals.
This isn't just a call for accountability; it's a demand for a thorough investigation into the extent of partisan influence and the role of embedded operatives in shaping the events of that fateful day. The American public deserves the truth, and those responsible for this egregious subversion of our democratic process must be brought to justice. The revelations about January 6th are a stark reminder of the urgent need to cleanse our system of corrupt influences and restore faith in our democratic institutions.
Return To Directory
LAW
Veterans Demand Accountability: Military Whistleblowers Call Out Unlawful Vaccine Mandates
January 5th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
In a bold and unprecedented move, over 230 veterans have united to sign a letter demanding accountability in military leadership for the egregious and unlawful orders related to the COVID-19 vaccine mandates. This letter, a scathing indictment of the higher echelons of military command, explicitly names generals, holding them responsible for a gross violation of military regulations and policies.
These mandates, enforced under the guise of Emergency Use Authorization, blatantly disregarded the fundamental requirement of informed consent, forcing service members to take an experimental vaccine. This coercive tactic, devoid of ethical consideration, trampled on the constitutional rights of service members, many of whom faced severe retaliation or were unjustly separated from service for their refusal to comply, despite having legitimate medical or religious exemptions.
The letter's signatories, comprising current and former service members, courageously risk their careers and standing to confront this grave injustice. They seek to recall retired generals from their comfortable civilian lives back to active duty to face courts martial. This action, grounded in the legal precedent of the McCarty v. McCarty Supreme Court case, will hold these former officers accountable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for the unlawful orders they issued while in service.
The plight of those who suffered under these mandates is heart-wrenching. Stories of service members losing their careers, benefits, and educational opportunities like the GI Bill highlight the profound personal cost of this institutional overreach. One woman's account of how these retaliatory actions cost her the ability to afford college is a stark reminder of the human toll behind these bureaucratic decisions.
The gravity of the situation is not lost on the current service members who have signed the letter. Despite the looming threat of retaliation, they felt compelled to stand up, not only for accountability but also for their fellow members who have suffered adverse effects from the vaccines and mandates. Their actions embody the very oaths they took to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
The organizers of this movement are not just stopping at this letter. They are actively working to educate the public and politicians about these issues. Their goal is to initiate congressional hearings, particularly from the House Armed Services Committee, to investigate these mandate issues thoroughly and hold the leadership accountable for their unlawful actions.
This movement also extends to the grassroots level. Candidates who have signed the letter are rallying for public support through donations, volunteering, and awareness campaigns. Unlike their counterparts backed by hefty corporate donations, these candidates rely on the power of the people to bring about change.
In conclusion, this petition represents a crucial first step in a larger battle for justice and integrity within not just the military, but across all spheres where the rights of Americans have been subverted. It's a clarion call for accountability, a reminder that those who swore to protect the Constitution must also adhere to its principles. If we can begin to hold military generals to account for their lawless behavior during the COVID era, perhaps it will cascade into broader reforms, bringing those who violated the sacred trust of the American people to justice. The time for action is now – for the future of our military and our nation.
Return To Directory
House Democrats' Calculated Attack: The Scheme to Disqualify Justice Thomas
January 6th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
In a blatant display of political maneuvering, House Democrats have launched their next orchestrated attack in their ongoing campaign against former President Trump. This time, their target is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whom they demand recuse himself from the Colorado Ballot case. This move is nothing short of a strategic ploy, a thinly-veiled attempt to manipulate the judicial process and ramp up pressure on the Supreme Court. Their choice to single out Justice Thomas, instead of one of Trump's own appointees, is a calculated decision, setting the stage for a broader assault on the integrity of the Court.
The House Democrats' letter, rife with accusations and insinuations, urges Justice Thomas to step down from the case, citing his wife Ginni Thomas's involvement in the January 6th events and alleged financial conflicts of interest. They weaponize the New Supreme Court's Code of Conduct, twisting its provisions to suit their narrative. The letter points to Ginni Thomas's participation in the "Stop the Steal" rally and her communications with Mark Meadows, arguing that these connections compromise Justice Thomas's impartiality. This is a desperate attempt to taint the Justice's reputation and undermine his judicial capabilities.
The Democrats' Ulterior Motive: Disqualifying Trump at Any Cost
This letter is just the tip of the iceberg in the Democrats' insidious plan. Their ultimate goal is clear: disqualify Donald Trump from the ballot by any means necessary. By targeting Justice Thomas, they aim to set a precedent that will allow them to go after the three justices appointed by Trump next. Their strategy is transparent - paint the Supreme Court as a "Trump Court," and then use this label to discredit any ruling that doesn't align with their political agenda.
Should Justice Thomas or his fellow justices refuse to recuse themselves, the Democrats are poised to launch a fierce media campaign, decrying any decision as biased and illegitimate. This narrative is not about justice or impartiality; it's about controlling the outcome of the election by discrediting Trump as an "insurrectionist," as per their contrived narrative in the Colorado Court.
The actions of the House Democrats represent a dangerous threat to the independence of the judiciary and the democratic process. Their letter demanding Justice Thomas's recusal is a clear indication of their willingness to subvert the principles of justice to achieve their political objectives. This is not just an attack on Justice Thomas or the Supreme Court; it's an assault on the very foundations of our democracy. The American people must see through this charade and recognize it for what it is - a desperate attempt by the Democrats to manipulate the judicial system and remove a candidate from the ballot, thereby denying Americans their right to choose their leader. This relentless pursuit of political power at the expense of judicial integrity and fairness must be vehemently opposed and exposed for the danger it poses to our nation's democratic values.
Return To Directory
Jack Smith: The Brazen Disregard for Legal Procedure in Trump Prosecution
January 5th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
In a flagrant display of contempt for legal norms and precedent, Special Counsel Jack Smith is unabashedly continuing discovery filings in the January 6 case against former President Donald Trump. Despite a judicial stay halting proceedings while Trump appeals on presidential immunity, Smith arrogantly insists his actions impose no "additional burdens" on Trump's legal team. This shameless maneuvering not only violates the stay order but also highlights Smith's reckless pursuit of Trump, driven by a partisan vendetta rather than the pursuit of justice.
Trump's team, rightly infuriated, has requested a federal judge to hold Smith in contempt. Smith's actions blatantly undermine the integrity of the legal process, demonstrating a disturbing pattern of bias and prosecutorial misconduct. By continuing to submit evidence and comply with suspended deadlines, Smith is essentially advancing the case toward trial, blatantly disrespecting the court's authority and the legal rights of the defendant.
Smith's Specious Arguments: A Mockery of Justice
The key points of Smith's legal brief reveal a startling disconnect from legal reality. The government's claim of not violating the court's stay order, under the pretense of fulfilling discovery obligations, is a thinly veiled attempt to keep the pressure on Trump. Smith's assertion that his actions require no response from the defendant is a ludicrous argument, showing a total disregard for the burden such proceedings inevitably place on Trump's team.
Quotes from the brief further expose Smith's audacity. The claim that the government has not violated the court's order is laughably disingenuous. Smith's insistence that the receipt of discovery materials and the early filing of pleadings impose no burden on Trump is a hollow argument, conveniently ignoring the implicit pressures and implications of such actions. The attempt to paint the government's actions as benign compliance rather than a strategic move to try Trump in absentia is not just misleading; it's a blatant distortion of the truth.
Jack Smith's relentless and politically motivated pursuit of Trump, especially in light of questions surrounding his own appointment's constitutionality, is a disturbing testament to the erosion of legal integrity in high-profile political cases. His deliberate disregard for legal precedent and the court's stay order is not just an affront to Trump but to the very foundations of our legal system. It's time for the judiciary to step in and hold Smith accountable for his reckless and partisan actions. His continued machinations in the face of legal directives are unacceptable and must be met with the full force of judicial censure. This is not just about one case or one defendant; it's about preserving the sanctity of our legal institutions and upholding the rule of law in the face of blatant political manipulation.
Return To Directory
OPINION
The Battle for Information: How the Twitter Files Changed the Game
January 2nd, 2024: By, Chris Filby
When Elon Musk decided to purchase Twitter, he knew it was probably the worst business decision he had ever made. In fact, it was so questionable that he tried to back out of the deal for cause — no doubt with good reason — at least twice before a Federal Court intervened. The court's decision forced him to take on additional investors to ensure the deal's successful completion. While resigned to paying far more than market value for a grossly mismanaged company, Musk was aware that the acquisition would also unlock the key to Pandora’s Box, including the infamous algorithm and a treasure trove of communications soon to be his. It remains unclear whether he received everything he was entitled to or if significant portions now reside unseen upon the ash-bin of history.
What we know now is that he unleashed demons straight from the bowels of hell itself. Contrary to expectations, those confronting these demons were not gung-ho conservative attack dogs eager for political advantage. Instead, it was a handpicked group of classic liberal journalists whom Mr. Musk, quite rightly, believed would use their skills to report their findings. However, what they didn't anticipate was discovering a truth that sent all they held holy into a nosedive, rivaling that of any Japanese Kamikaze pilot. Thus were born the Twitter Files, leading to a massive lawsuit brought by Attorneys General from Missouri and Louisiana, among others, against President Biden. Due to their voluminous and complex nature, these files have spurred other investigative journalists to unearth staggering evidence of election interference and conspiracies aimed at unravelling the very fabric of our Republic, using methods our government developed to inspire regime change in other countries.
This phenomenon did not begin and end with Twitter (now X); it also involved other tech giants controlling the flow of information, such as Meta (formerly Facebook) with its platforms Facebook and Instagram, and Google with its search engine and YouTube acquisition. All these entities are implicated in Missouri v. Biden and are under scrutiny in ongoing investigations by Congress, state governments, and the private sector. Unpacking this complex and tedious issue is challenging, yet there's no shortage of volunteers eager to understand how their rights were manipulated for political and financial gain.
Articles currently available and forthcoming offer in-depth analyses of the implications for the United States and the potential continuation of these tactics if this information remains undisclosed. This vital knowledge comes to light thanks to the courage of men and women dedicated to uncovering and presenting the truth, even when it seems too incredible to be true. One such source is America Mission, where Editor-in-Chief Walter Curt has established a platform rapidly expanding with the latest information as it becomes available. America Mission adheres to the highest journalistic standards.
We can be thankful for having the tools to engage in the democratic process more actively. These tools empower us to question our elected representatives and candidates for office, reassuring us that we are not alone in our beliefs.
We have the truth on our side and the wind in our sails. Never give up up!
Chris Filby is an American Businessman and a member of America Mission Inc. Board of Directors.
Return To Directory
X-SPACE OF THE WEEK
Unveiling January 6th: A Unique Perspective from America Mission's Founders
January 6th, 2024: By, America Mission Inc.
Discover a fresh and unexplored perspective on the January 6th events in this week's special feature on America Mission's X-Space. Founders Dustin Stockton and Jennifer Lawrence offer a riveting account of the day, distinct from mainstream narratives. Their personal experiences, supported by exclusive footage, provide an insightful look into the chaos and complexities of that fateful day.
This X-Space session isn't just a recounting of events; it's an immersive journey. Dustin and Jennifer’s firsthand insights paint a vivid picture, contrasting sharply with the often one-dimensional portrayal in the media. Listen in as they unravel the intricacies of January 6th, bringing to light aspects of the story that have remained untold and unacknowledged.
Whether seeking clarity, a new perspective, or simply curious about the untold stories of January 6th, this X-Space is an essential listen. Join us as we delve into a narrative rich with nuance and honesty, challenging preconceived notions and offering a deeper understanding of one of the most controversial days in recent history.
Tune in to America Mission's X-Space for a compelling and enlightening session that promises to reshape your understanding of January 6th. This is your opportunity to hear a story that has been overshadowed in the public discourse, until now.
Return To Directory
