The Infiltration of Critical Immigration Theory in Classrooms: A Parental Wake-Up Call
Exposure in Georgia: Middle Schoolers' Required Reading Pushes Pro-Illegal Immigration Narrative
A Parent's Stand Against Stealth Ideologies
January 27th, 2024: By, Walter Curt
In an audacious move that lays bare the ideological warfare being waged in our education system, a Georgia county school has mandated the reading of "Crossing The Wire," a book steeped in the dangerous ethos of Critical Immigration Theory, for its impressionable sixth graders. This isn't education; it's indoctrination, pure and simple.
Real Politically Savvy, a vigilant parent and member of the Trump campaign, stumbled upon this leftist propaganda masquerading as children's literature in her daughter's English curriculum. The book paints illegal immigrants as mere victims in a heart-wrenching struggle, blatantly ignoring the complex, multifaceted reality of illegal immigration and its profound impact on American society. The narrative seeks to instill unwarranted sympathy for lawbreakers, undermining the rule of law and the very sovereignty of our nation.
Critical Immigration Theory, the backbone of this book, is a thinly veiled attempt to subvert the minds of our young, teaching them to view migration through a distorted lens that favors the intruder over the citizen. It advocates for a world where borders are irrelevant, and the rights of illegal immigrants are prioritized over the security and welfare of legal residents.
Quotes from the book like, "Or we could get deported tomorrow... But even if we did, we would come back," are a blatant attempt to romanticize and normalize illegal border crossing. This is not just a story; it's a calculated piece of propaganda aimed at softening the stance on illegal immigration among our children, sowing seeds of dissent and division.
Savvy's demand for a public response from the Board of Education is a stark critique of their decision to include "Crossing The Wire" required reading, accusing the school of promoting illegal immigration sympathies under the guise of education. "You’re trying to garner sympathy from children for illegal immigrants crossing the US border ILLEGALLY," she asserts, highlighting the curriculum's dangerous tilt towards indoctrination. Her words reflect a broader concern: that such narratives risk undermining respect for the law and the Constitution, fundamentally misguiding our youth about the complexities of immigration and its legal and social ramifications.
She forcefully rebukes the school for not offering a way for parents to opt out of politically charged material, emphasizing the need for parental say in educational content. She makes it clear, "Polarizing topics, particularly in today's political environment, should be decided by parents," demanding the school explain the inclusion of leftist propaganda in her daughter's mandatory reading. With the school board's February 8th meeting on the horizon, her plea for openness and an end to such indoctrination is echoed by many parents and community members, all united in anticipation of decisive action.
The question looms large: Why were parents left in the dark about such contentious required reading? Why is there no provision for parents to exempt their children from exposure to such overt political indoctrination? This incident is not an isolated one but indicative of a broader, more insidious trend where Critical Immigration Theory and other Marxist ideologies are surreptitiously woven into the fabric of our educational content. Such a blatant political agenda, aimed at indoctrinating middle school students under the guise of education, is unacceptable.
The infiltration of Marxist ideologies, including Critical Immigration Theory, into our educational curricula marks a disturbing expansion beyond the already contentious LGBT agenda. This encroachment of politically charged leftist ideologies into the classroom is unacceptable. Schools are meant to be sanctuaries of learning and critical inquiry, not breeding grounds for partisan indoctrination. It is imperative that both political parties stand united in upholding the Constitution and ensuring our educational system fosters a learning environment free from political bias.
As the February 8th school board meeting approaches, the urgency for parental vigilance has never been more critical. It's a clarion call for parents to awaken to the myriad forms of Marxist indoctrination infiltrating the classrooms of their children. The battle extends beyond the well-publicized LGBT propaganda and the explicit materials that organizations like Moms for Liberty are fervently opposing. It encompasses all forms of ideologically charged literature, such as "Crossing The Wire," which are subtly shaping the minds of our impressionable youth. The left has cunningly exploited this vulnerability, embedding subversive ideologies within educational content. Parents must now adopt a stance of hyper-vigilance, meticulously scrutinizing every piece of required reading to safeguard their children's minds. The fight against these insidious influences is paramount, demanding action not only against the overtly controversial topics but against every strand of indoctrination lurking within our educational systems.
Great piece. Thank you.
Imagine being the sixth grader whose parent's legally immigrated and followed all the laws, reading this book. How many questions would run through his mind about his own family's sacrifices in the name of freedom? To be taught to glorify and pity the people whose first step into the U.S. is to break a federal law, is to warp right from wrong.