Who is Norm Eisen?

The Political Operative Behind Efforts to Bar Trump

The Mastermind Behind the Campaign to Thwart Trump

December 29th, 2023: By, Walter Curt

The intricate web of political tactics deployed against former President Donald Trump unveils a key orchestrator: Norm Eisen. As a co-founder of the Voter Protection Program and a significant figure in the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), Eisen's involvement in shaping strategies to impede Trump’s political journey is becoming increasingly evident. His role extends beyond mere opposition; it represents a calculated effort to influence critical decisions and events that have left indelible marks on the American political narrative.

Eisen's influence is particularly discernible in two major political junctures: the absence of National Guard deployment on January 6th and the legal maneuvers leading to Trump’s disqualification from the 2024 presidential ballot. These instances are not isolated events but rather elements of a broader, cohesive strategy aimed at neutralizing Trump’s influence in American politics. This article delves into Eisen’s multifaceted role, uncovering the tactics and implications of his actions in the grander scheme of American political dynamics. From his advisory role in state-level decisions to his legal orchestrations at the federal level, Eisen emerges as a central figure in the concerted efforts to challenge Trump's political legitimacy and aspirations.

TIP and Color Revolution Techniques

Applying Regime Change Playbook Domestically

Norm Eisen's participation in the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) represents more than mere contingency planning for the 2020 election; it symbolizes the domestic application of a tried and tested blueprint for political upheaval. The TIP, known for its "war games" simulations of a contested election, echoes the strategies of Color Revolutions, a set of regime change tactics historically utilized by the United States in foreign contexts. In this role, Eisen transcends the conventional boundaries of political opposition, adopting methods that are traditionally associated with destabilizing foreign governments. His involvement in these exercises suggests a deliberate strategy to apply these potent techniques within the American political framework, targeting the Trump presidency.

This utilization of Color Revolution strategies is not merely theoretical but reflects a practical, methodical approach to influencing the political narrative and altering the course of American governance. The parallels between TIP's activities and the Color Revolution playbook are striking and intentional, signaling a shift in how domestic political battles are waged. Eisen's role in this process reveals a comprehensive effort to import these tactics into the U.S. political arena, repurposing them to challenge and potentially dismantle the Trump administration's hold on power. This strategic application of regime change methodologies represents a significant escalation in the nature of political conflict within the United States, one that redefines the landscape of American electoral politics and governance.

Legal and Media Campaigns

Orchestrating a Multi-Front Offensive Against Trump

Norm Eisen's tactical engagement in the legal and media spheres forms a comprehensive campaign against Donald Trump. His notable involvement in the impeachment proceedings and his ties with influential anti-Trump groups, particularly Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), signify a dedicated effort to challenge Trump’s legitimacy and presidency. Eisen’s approach is not limited to legal battles; it extends to a broader media narrative, effectively utilizing the press as a tool to amplify his legal maneuvers and shape public opinion. This dual strategy of legal and media engagement reveals Eisen’s adeptness in orchestrating a multi-dimensional offensive against his political adversaries, positioning himself as a key player in the anti-Trump movement.

CREW’s Litigation and Influence in the Judicial Arena

The influence of CREW, co-founded by Eisen, is markedly evident in the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot. This ruling, a culmination of CREW’s litigation efforts, serves as a prime example of Eisen’s strategic use of the judiciary to further his political objectives. The decision, widely criticized for its tenuous legal basis, is reflective of a larger pattern where Eisen leverages legal systems to target political opponents. This tactic of utilizing the courts as a battleground against Trump not only underscores Eisen’s influence in the legal domain but also highlights a concerning trend of politicization within the judiciary. Eisen's orchestration of such legal challenges goes beyond mere legal contestation; it represents a deliberate and methodical effort to manipulate the judicial process for political gain, setting a precedent that could fundamentally alter the dynamics of political competition and governance in the United States.

Eisen's Influence on National Guard Deployment Decisions

New revelations about Norm Eisen's role in the Voter Protection Program, brought to light by ‘Bad Kitty’, bring to light his advisory against the deployment of National Guard troops during key electoral periods, including the contentious events of January 6th. This guidance, positioned as a legal recommendation to state governors, may have significantly impacted the decision-making process regarding the National Guard's involvement during critical moments of political unrest. The absence of National Guard troops on January 6th, a day marked by chaos at the Capitol, highlights the potential ramifications of Eisen's influence and advice.

The Strategic Fabric of Eisen’s Political Endeavors

Norm Eisen’s extensive involvement in various political arenas – from his direct advisory roles to his legal and media campaigns against Donald Trump – reveals a multifaceted strategy aimed at influencing the American political landscape. The interplay of his tactics, ranging from advising state officials on National Guard deployment to orchestrating legal challenges against Trump, suggests a coordinated effort to wield influence at pivotal moments in U.S. politics. His background in fostering regime changes abroad further intensifies concerns about his approach to domestic political maneuvering.

Implications for Democratic Processes and Political Accountability

The culmination of Eisen's activities poses significant questions about the sanctity of democratic processes and the ethical boundaries of political influence. By leveraging his expertise in regime change and applying similar tactics within the U.S., Eisen’s actions blur the lines between legitimate political strategy and manipulative interference. His endeavors underscore the need for transparency and accountability in political operations, especially when they have the potential to sway electoral outcomes and national policy. Understanding the extent and impact of Eisen's tactics is crucial for preserving the integrity of democratic institutions and ensuring that the will of the electorate is not undermined by sophisticated political maneuvering. As these revelations continue to unfold, they challenge us to critically evaluate the role and influence of political operatives like Eisen in shaping the democratic fabric of America.