The A.M. Dispatch
The A.M. Dispatch
Edition For - December 31st, 2023: The W.C. Dispatch's Year End Report, Delta Airlines Controversy, and The Trump Ballot Rulings
Welcome to The Weekend Dispatch.
Our Digital Newspaper.
We welcome any feedback to make your experience more enjoyable.
Send any feedback to Editor@WCdispatch.com
DISPATCH DIRECTORY
FEATURED:
The America Mission’s End of Year Report
POLITICS:
Delta Airlines Embroiled in Controversial Migrant Transport Scandal
Political Hostility Escalates: Republican Congress Members Swatted on Christmas Day
LAW:
OPINION:
AMERICA MISSION END OF YEAR REPORT
December 31st, 2023: By, Walter Curt
This year has been nothing short of a whirlwind for our publication. In just six short months since our inception, The W.C. Dispatch, in collaboration with America Mission, has emerged as a beacon of trustworthy news and incisive reporting. We have delved into stories shunned by mainstream media, offering you an unfiltered perspective on critical issues. Our coverage has spanned a wide array of topics - from shedding light on the Uranium One whistleblower to exposing the Capitol Police’s coercive use of NDAs, from revealing local police departments’ efforts to conceal illegal immigrants to providing nuanced legal analyses of the relentless legal battles faced by former President Donald Trump.
The Freedom of Information
As the censorship machine shows signs of fracture, thanks in part to the newfound transparency ushered in by Elon Musk's X platform, we've witnessed a noticeable shift in the media narrative. However, this change doesn't imply a reduction in the challenges we face. The nation seems to be hurtling towards a critical juncture. The recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court, declaring Trump ineligible for the ballot, is symptomatic of a broader crisis. This decision heralds a time when the acceptance of national election results, irrespective of the winner, is at risk of being vehemently contested by a divided country. The ongoing legal persecution of Trump and his supporters, coupled with the FBI's relentless pursuit of January 6th participants, only adds fuel to the fire. Moreover, the sustained offensive by legacy media against independent information outlets seems to be an unending battle in the war for truth.
In the midst of the trials our nation faces, there are glimmers of hope signaling that all is not lost. The recent amalgamation of America Mission with The W.C. Dispatch marks a significant stride forward, galvanized by the collective efforts of numerous volunteers, the growing support from thousands of subscribers, and the burgeoning momentum of a new political movement. This union signifies more than just a merger; it embodies the burgeoning resistance against forces seeking to divide and conquer the American spirit.
The battle against the pervasive and divisive apparatus is escalating towards what promises to be an intense and formidable climax. As we confront and push back against the relentless psychological operations waged against our nation, we can anticipate fierce resistance. The system, in its desperation, will undoubtedly struggle vehemently, yet our resolve remains stronger than ever.
The Fight is Biblical
This fight is reminiscent of the biblical narrative of Sodom and Gomorrah, where God promised to spare the cities if only ten righteous men stood up for truth and justice. In America today, we find not just ten, but thousands of citizens steadfastly refusing to capitulate to the manipulative narratives of the system. These individuals are not just passive observers but active participants willing to invest their time, resources, and energy in the pursuit of a just and free America.
The legal confrontations with governmental overreach are accumulating at an unprecedented rate, demonstrating a burgeoning resistance against authoritarian tendencies. The rise of citizen journalism has revolutionized the landscape of information dissemination, empowering individuals to seek and spread truth in the face of widespread misinformation. Men and women across the country, who once questioned their role in this fight, are now stepping forward, resolved to contribute in any capacity they can. They no longer seek direction but instead take initiative, driven by a profound sense of responsibility to safeguard their freedoms and the principles upon which our nation was founded.
Across the United States, a resolute awakening is unfolding. Americans are rising, refusing to watch the erosion of their nation at the hands of self-serving tyrants. Christians, long dormant in a state of tolerant hibernation, are re-emerging, ready to reclaim their voice. Parents are actively combating the indoctrination rampant in educational institutions. This burgeoning movement, fueled by revelations of questionable activities in the 2020 election, is a testament to the unyielding spirit of the American people. Their righteous indignation is a clear message to those who falsely profess superiority.
Make America Your Mission
America Mission stands at the forefront of this movement. We take immense pride in our role as a beacon of truth and a platform for change. As we continue to grow and expand our influence, our greatest aspiration is for you, our readers and supporters, to join us in this crucial endeavor. Whether through volunteering, membership, or simply by sharing our work and the voices of truth, your involvement is pivotal. Our aim is to empower every American to rise, to speak out, and to ardently defend their country. We recognize that the frontline of defense lies within each individual, and no external savior will rescue us from the challenges we face.
At America Mission, we are committed to equipping you with the necessary tools to make a tangible difference. Remember, no victory is too small, and no amount of labeling—be it racist, sexist, xenophobic, or any other baseless 'ism'—should deter your resolve. The most vital directive is the one that begins with you: to wake up each day with the purpose of Making America Your Mission.
As we close this year, the team at America Mission extends heartfelt wishes for a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year. Looking ahead to 2024, we encourage you to continue standing tall for your family, your neighbors, and your nation. Let's stride into the future with determination, upholding the values that make America truly great.
Return To Directory
POLITICS
Plan and Action: The Strategy to Thwart Trump in 2020
December 22nd, 2023: By, Walter Curt
Part 1: The Election Integrity Project's Blueprint
In August 2020, the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) laid the groundwork for what would become a calculated endeavor to subvert the potential re-election of President Trump. This group of bipartisan experts meticulously planned various contentious election scenarios, all pointing towards one goal: ensuring a Trump defeat at any cost. The TIP's scenario exercises, with role-plays varying from ambiguous election outcomes to clear victories for either candidate, emphasized the crucial role of preserving the integrity of the election process against Trump's potential disregard for norms.
Through simulations, TIP revealed the harsh reality of a deeply contested election. The scenarios were painted with Trump's team exploiting executive powers to manipulate the election outcome, while Biden's team adhered to established norms. The recommendations from these exercises were clear: Prepare for a protracted legal battle, bolster local election officials, preemptively counter Trump's voter fraud claims, and brace for violent protests. TIP's final stance was unequivocal - any post-Trump era would require significant measures to curb executive powers and restore political norms, hinting at the drastic lengths to which they were prepared to go to ensure Trump's defeat.
Part 2: "The Count" - Operationalizing the TIP's Strategy
Building on the TIP's groundwork, the Sunrise Movement's "The Count" document, drafted in October 2020, outlines a detailed action plan for January 6th, the day Congress was scheduled to count the Electoral College votes. This document was more than a guide; it was a battle plan for the left, designed to disrupt and challenge the electoral process at every turn.
"The Count" emphasized the critical nature of January 6th as a potential crisis point. It mapped out scenarios where disputes over electors could lead to congressional standoffs and outlined a strategy for Biden and the Democrats to fight tooth and nail in Congress without conceding. Mass public mobilization, protests, and civil disobedience were earmarked as tools to exert pressure and influence the congressional procedural battle.
In a more sinister twist, the document discussed potential tactics to disrupt the ballot count, from legal maneuvers to intimidate election officials. It painted a picture of deploying extreme measures, such as declaring martial law or using federal troops to quell election-related protests. "The Count" urged Democratic officials and citizens to be vigilant, ‘protect election administrators,’ and continue the ballot count beyond established deadlines.
Together, these documents - the strategic planning of TIP and the operational directives of "The Count" - expose a meticulously orchestrated plan. Far from being mere countermeasures to Trump's election tactics, they unveil a deliberate scheme to disrupt and skew the democratic process itself. This revelation not only casts a shadow on the integrity of the groups involved but also lays bare the extreme lengths they were prepared to go to avert Trump's re-election, casting doubt on their professed commitment to democratic principles.
This critical information was initially released back in 2020 by Millie Weaver, but faced rampant censorship, as uncovered in the Twitter Files. The suppression of these details by major platforms effectively buried the story, preventing it from gaining the widespread attention it deserved. However, with Elon Musk championing a new era of information freedom, this story has resurfaced, unshackled from the constraints that previously silenced it.
Now, as this information re-enters the public domain, it's imperative that it be disseminated widely. The narrative around January 6th, painted as a desperate authoritarian grasp by Trump, in reality, reflects a scenario where his opponents were the ones resorting to any means necessary to stop him. The public must be informed about this orchestrated plan that aimed to frame Trump, shaping a narrative that has significantly impacted American politics. In the pursuit of truth and transparency, it falls upon every informed citizen to share this story, ensuring that the real events leading up to and on January 6th are widely understood and acknowledged.
Return To Directory
Delta Airlines Embroiled in Controversial Migrant Transport Scandal
December 22nd, 2023: By, Mike Melo & Walter Curt
In an explosive revelation that shakes the core of national security protocols, Delta Airlines has been thrust into the spotlight for allegedly facilitating the transportation of unvetted illegal migrants across the United States. This alarming situation came to light through a viral video by journalist Ashley St. Clair, showcasing the shocking reality of "no-name-given" boarding passes being issued to illegal migrants traveling in first-class from Phoenix, AZ to NYC and other major cities. The incident has sparked widespread outrage and concern, highlighting a glaring lapse in airline and national security procedures.
Further intensifying the scandal, several journalists, including America Mission's own Mike Melo, encountered groups of African migrants at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX), Arizona, during the final day of Turning Point USA’s annual conservative conference, AmFest. Reports of these sightings began circulating on X (formerly Twitter) even before Melo departed from the event.
While at Sky Harbor's Delta check-in line, Melo engaged in a revealing conversation with one migrant, facilitated by Google Translate. Initially, the migrant, who was visibly nervous and fidgeting with his blue cloth facemask, claimed to be from New York. However, as the conversation progressed, he admitted to being a migrant on a layover flight to Detroit, eventually heading to New York. Throughout the airport, Melo observed numerous migrants waiting with similar documents in hand.
The controversy deepened as several Delta pilots, under the veil of anonymity, voiced their unease in X-spaces discussions, admitting their inability to identify passengers on their flights. This disturbing admission underscores a significant breach in aviation safety protocols, where the identity of individuals aboard a commercial flight remains a mystery to even those piloting the aircraft. The pilots' decision to come forward, albeit with scrambled voices to protect their identities, adds credibility to the claims and paints a worrying picture of the current state of airline security.
Further fueling the fire, reports have emerged of American Airlines compelling their pilots to install AA security software on their phones in a desperate attempt to contain the escalating scandal. This move, perceived as a cover-up tactic, raises serious questions about the extent of the airlines' involvement and knowledge of these dubious practices.
At the heart of this scandal is the practice of boarding illegal migrants onto commercial flights without proper identification. Videos and eyewitness accounts, like those of Melo, reveal migrants being issued boarding passes labeled "no name given," bypassing the traditional and critical security screening processes. This blatant disregard for established security measures not only endangers passengers but also undermines the integrity of the nation's transportation security systems.
The reassignment of air marshals from their primary duties on flights to non-law enforcement tasks at the border further exacerbates the situation. This strategic shift in deployment weakens the security presence on commercial flights, creating a potential risk for passengers and crew alike.
Documents and boarding passes obtained in the course of this investigation, while redacted to protect sources, have been shared with credible journalists, enabling further scrutiny and exposure of this deeply troubling issue. The revelations brought forth in this case highlight a severe lapse in airline security and immigration processing, underscoring the need for immediate action and thorough investigation.
In summary, the Delta Airlines migrant transport scandal is a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in our national security apparatus. It calls into question the policies and practices of airlines and government agencies responsible for ensuring the safety of air travel. As the story unfolds, the public demands answers and accountability from those at the helm of this disturbing breach of trust and safety.
Return To Directory
→Rep. Matt Gaetz has issued an inquiry to Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian: probing the airline's involvement in transporting non-resident aliens near the border. Gaetz's letter demands clarity on several critical points: the number of non-resident aliens transported by Delta since January 20, 2021; the specifics of how NGOs purchase or reimburse tickets for these individuals; any incentives or reimbursements received from the government for such transport; and whether the TSA has advised Delta on acceptable forms of identification for nonresident aliens to clear security and board flights. This inquiry intensifies the scrutiny on Delta's practices amidst escalating concerns over airline security and immigration procedures.
Political Hostility Escalates: Republican Congress Members Swatted on Christmas Day
December 26th, 2023: By, Walter Curt
In a disturbing display of political toxicity, Republican Representatives Brandon Williams of New York and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia were the targets of dangerous "swatting" incidents on Christmas Day. This malicious tactic, involving false crime reports to summon police responses, underscores the alarming level of hostility in today's political landscape. The representatives expressed gratitude for the swift and professional law enforcement actions that diffused these potentially volatile situations.
Representative Williams, acknowledging the severity of the false alarm, appreciated the response team's professionalism, humorously noting they left with holiday treats like cookies and nuts. Meanwhile, Representative Greene, a frequent target with at least eight swatting attempts against her, including fabricated shooting reports, emphasized the gravity of these malicious acts. The Georgia police, familiar with responding to such incidents at Greene's residence, confirmed the lack of any genuine emergency during this latest swatting attempt.
These swatting incidents against public figures are not just reckless pranks; they pose real risks to the safety of individuals and law enforcement officers. Moreover, they drain valuable police resources and taxpayer money. The perpetrators, hiding behind anonymity, aim to instill fear and disrupt the personal lives of these elected officials, reflecting a deeply concerning trend in political discourse.
The swatting attacks on Representatives Williams and Greene highlight a troubling escalation in political hostility, where disagreement escalates into life-threatening scenarios. The need for serious legal consequences for these actions is clear. Charging perpetrators for the costs incurred by police departments could be a start, but broader measures must be considered to deter such dangerous behaviors and uphold a civil and safe political environment.
Return To Directory
LAW
Trump Colorado & Maine Rulings: The Flood Gates Open
December 22nd, 2023: By, Walter Curt & Jeremy Price
In a ruling that threatens to tear at the very fabric of America, the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Donald Trump from the ballot is not just extreme, it's a dangerous precedent that could plunge the nation into deeper division. This 4-3 ruling, starkly criticized by the Chief Justice as perilous, is more than a legal maneuver—it's a brazen assault on the electoral rights of Americans. The audacity of the court to suggest that voters don't have the right to choose their candidate is nothing short of outrageous.
Remarkably, the ruling itself admits its own fragility, stating that an appeal by Trump would automatically stay the decision until the Supreme Court rules on it. So, in essence, this decision seems more like a headline-grabbing ploy than a genuine attempt to block Trump from the ballot. It's a startling attempt to dictate voter choice and an absurd leap in legal judgment.
The Trojan Horse
The W.C. Dispatch highlighted the deceptive nature of the so-called 'victory' in the district court for Trump. We predicted this outcome, recognizing the district court’s decision as a Trojan Horse. The ruling, while seemingly advantageous in the short term, cleverly laid the groundwork for higher courts to accept their fact finding from the district court. By accepting that Trump’s speech had failed the Brandeburg test, this meant that his speech was no longer protected by the First Amendment.
It was a strategic play, allowing Trump to stay on the ballot but setting the stage for far more challenging legal battles, potentially reinterpreting the 14th Amendment and bringing intense scrutiny to political speech, which is the most protected form of speech in the country.
The Ruling
The court's decision to disqualify former President Trump from the state's presidential primary ballot leveraged specific Colorado election code provisions. This move, ostensibly under the banner of state rights, hinges on a controversial interpretation of the state's authority over election procedures. While Sections 1-1-113 and 1-4-1204(4) of the Colorado election code provide mechanisms for challenging a candidate's eligibility, the court's application of these sections to exclude a federal presidential candidate raises significant legal and constitutional questions.
The majority's reliance on Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, concluding Trump's alleged involvement in the January 6th insurrection, underscores this tension. This interpretation suggests a novel, state-level authority to determine the eligibility of federal candidates, conflicting with broader electoral norms and federal oversight.
However, this approach has sparked considerable debate and dissent, particularly around the scope of state powers versus federal election guidelines. Critics argue that while states have significant leeway in managing their elections, extending this authority to unilaterally bar a federal presidential candidate from the ballot oversteps constitutional boundaries. This complex legal landscape sets the stage for further scrutiny in the dissenting opinion, highlighting the intricate balance between state rights and federal election integrity.
The Dissent
In his dissent, Chief Justice Boatright highlighted significant legal concerns regarding the majority's decision to disqualify former President Trump from the Colorado presidential primary ballot. He challenged the majority's reliance on the Colorado election code, particularly Section 1-1-113, as a sufficient basis for adjudicating claims of Trump's ineligibility under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Justice Boatright underscored that the complex legal and factual issues surrounding the claim of Trump's involvement in insurrection far exceeded the adjudicative scope of Section 1-1-113’s expedited procedures. He noted that the compressed timelines dictated by this section were not adhered to in this case, indicating the inappropriateness of using such summary proceedings for a matter of this magnitude.
Moreover, Chief Justice Boatright contended that the Colorado General Assembly did not envisage such intricate constitutional questions being handled within the framework of the election code's challenge provision. He believed that the claim's complexity and the constitutional implications it bore warranted a dismissal of the case, rather than delving into its merits under the constrained processes of section 1-1-113.
Essentially, his dissent pointed out that the current legal framework within Colorado’s election code was not designed to address claims as intricate and constitutionally charged as the alleged insurrectionist disqualification of a presidential candidate. This perspective highlights a critical gap between state election regulations and the broader constitutional considerations they must contend with, especially in matters pertaining to federal elections.
The Flood Gates Open
The legal battles unfolding across the United States in the wake of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling against former President Donald Trump’s eligibility for the ballot have now seen a significant development. Maine has followed Colorado’s lead, becoming the second state to disqualify Trump from the 2024 primary ballot. This move is based on the "insurrectionist ban" outlined in the 14th Amendment.
Maine's Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows, has cited the January 6th Capitol attack as evidence that Trump "engaged in insurrection," using his claims about the election to incite his supporters. Bellows has asserted her duty under Maine law to keep unqualified candidates off the ballot, leaning on the recent Colorado ruling for justification. However, she acknowledges that the US Supreme Court is likely to be the final arbiter in this issue.
Trump's defense team, contesting Bellows' interpretation, argues that the 14th Amendment’s insurrectionist ban does not apply to presidential candidates. Nonetheless, Bellows has rejected this defense, stating that the text and history of the amendment clearly cover the presidency. Trump’s legal team has announced their intention to appeal the decision in Maine state courts, with the decision currently paused pending this appeal.
This latest development in Maine, coupled with the Colorado ruling, indicates a growing trend where states are actively employing the 14th Amendment to challenge Trump's eligibility. These cases reflect more than just legal disputes; they represent a concerted effort by political forces to influence the electoral landscape at the state level, raising profound questions about the balance of state and federal powers in determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.
This unfolding scenario is more than a series of legal disputes; it represents a deliberate attempt by a group of political elites to dictate the electoral choices of the American public. This widespread campaign to disqualify Trump from ballots across the nation transcends typical legal battles, standing as a direct assault on the democratic rights of American voters. It challenges the core principles of electoral democracy and poses a severe threat to the concept of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Return To Directory
Smith vs. Trump: A Legal Battle Marred by Supreme Court Critiques and Constitutional Controversies
December 22nd, 2023: By, Walter Curt
Jack Smith continues to have yet another bad week with his lawfare tactics. His ongoing legal battle against former President Donald Trump is not only facing severe challenges at the Supreme Court but also raising profound questions about the constitutional validity of his appointment and actions. Smith's approach, reminiscent of another case where Chief Justice Roberts emphatically rebuked his overreaching interpretation of 'official act', reflects an attempt to criminalize political activities, an approach starkly at odds with the ethos of American governance.
Chief Justice Roberts previously critiqued Smith for his broad interpretation of 'official act,' warning of the dangerous precedent it could set. This interpretation, according to Roberts, risks criminalizing everyday activities essential to the functioning of public officials, potentially stifling their ability to effectively serve their constituents. This concern is particularly relevant in the context of the charges against Trump, specifically the obstruction of ‘an official proceeding.’ The parallels between this charge and the language contested in Smith’s case in 2016 are striking. By employing a similarly expansive definition, there's a risk of blurring the lines between legitimate political actions and criminal conduct.
Adding to Smith's woes, former Attorney General Ed Meese and two constitutional scholars have challenged the legality of his appointment in an amicus brief. They argue that Smith's appointment as special counsel is unconstitutional, lacking both the authority and proper procedure as mandated by the Appointments Clause. According to them, Smith occupies an office that does not legally exist, appointed through powers that the Attorney General does not possess. They contend that Smith's significant powers necessitate presidential nomination and Senate confirmation, criteria conspicuously unmet in his case.
The Supreme Court's recent decision to not expedite a ruling on Trump's immunity plea further complicates matters for Smith. This delay pushes back the likelihood of a trial beginning on the slated March 4th date, transferring the issue to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Trump's legal team maintains that his actions post-election were within the scope of his presidential duties, a stance the Supreme Court seems hesitant to challenge hastily.
This legal stalemate not only hampers Smith's immediate objectives but also places Trump in a peculiar position. While these legal entanglements have bolstered his support among Republican voters, they simultaneously risk alienating independent and moderate voters crucial for election victories. A recent survey indicating that a majority view Trump's post-election actions as illegal efforts to stop election certification only adds to this complexity.
Trump, undeterred, continues to frame these legal challenges as battles against an elitist establishment targeting him for championing his supporters. This narrative has found resonance among rival GOP candidates, particularly in the wake of the controversial Colorado ruling barring Trump from the ballot, amplifying his assertions of being unfairly targeted.
On the other hand, Democrats view the Capitol riot and Trump's legal ordeals as emblematic of the threats his movement poses to democracy. In contrast, Trump and his surrogates downplay the riot's severity, intertwining it with broader cultural and political issues to mobilize support.
In sum, Jack Smith's legal crusade against Trump, fraught with constitutional challenges and Supreme Court rebukes, not only highlights his relentless pursuit but also underscores the intricate interplay of law, politics, and public perception shaping America's contemporary political saga.
Return To Directory
OPINION
Wokeness and History… The Undoing of Time
December 21st, 2023: By Chris Filby
Today, as I scanned my radio while driving, I heard a story about Arlington National Cemetery, located across the Potomac River from Washington, DC. It's the final resting place for many of America’s war dead, Medal of Honor winners, and most famously, the Tomb of the Unknowns and the Eternal Flame that illuminates the grave of President John F. Kennedy.
The story was about a post-Civil War statue erected to represent the coming together of two sides, North and South, Confederate and Yankee. Unfortunately, having been named the Confederate Memorial, it was slated for removal, no questions asked. That is, until a lawsuit put a stop to it.
This may be one of the last controversial monuments left standing in the United States. The radio commentator pondered aloud whether graves of soldiers who fought for the 'wrong side' would be removed. While I’m not certain they even exist, similar actions occurred in Tennessee with the relocation of the grave of General Forester and his wife, which were part of a Confederate monument. General Forester was a prominent citizen in the area at that time.
Blood stains the soil across our nation, where numbers too large to imagine perished. To illustrate, the American death toll in all major wars from the American Revolutionary War through the Vietnam War, excluding the Civil War, totals 672,000. The death toll during the Civil War was 655,000. The Union (winners) lost about 364,500 people, or approximately 250 per day. This number is only 41,000 less than all the people the US lost in World War II.
How can any of us say that the story of the Civil War and all its ugliness needs to be erased simply because 'wokeness sensitivity' believes it is too hurtful? Do these deaths pale in comparison to being misgendered? Really? Should statues and monuments be the way we honor people or events going forward? We are making poor choices these days.
2020 saw George Floyd’s death honored with statues and monuments across the country, in one case replacing a statue that was the likeness of Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence and the third President of the United States. If you are wondering why Mr. Floyd was honored in error, I suggest ordering a copy of his coroner’s report or watching the documentary film “The Fall of Minneapolis”.
Chris Filby is an American Businessman and a member of America Mission Inc. Board of Directors.
Return To Directory
Governor Mike DeWine: Ohio's Poster Child for RINO Politics and Betrayal
December 30th, 2023: By, Walter Curt
Ohio Republicans, brace yourselves for yet another letdown from Governor Mike DeWine, the epitome of Republican In Name Only (RINO) politics. His latest act of betrayal? Vetoing legislation aimed at protecting transgender youth from premature, life-altering medical interventions. This move is far from surprising; it's just the latest in a string of disappointments from a governor who has consistently demonstrated his disconnect from conservative values.
Let's call it like it is: DeWine's governorship has been nothing short of a squishy, half-hearted attempt at conservatism. Remember the COVID curfew, which was so absurd that it prompted many of us, including myself, to hold a defiant party right in his front yard? Or how about his cozy relationship with the ATF, allowing them to set up intelligence operations in Ohio, as if our state were a playground for federal overreach? And let's not forget his habitual avoidance of President Trump during visits to Ohio, showcasing his lack of spine in the face of real conservative leadership.
DeWine's recent veto slams the door on critical legislation that sought to safeguard children from irreversible ‘gender-affirming’ procedures, including hormone therapy, surgery, and certain mental health services. The bill also aimed to maintain fairness in female sports by addressing the participation of transgender athletes. But in classic DeWine fashion, he chose to side with the fallacy that the government doesn't know better than parents in this arena, ignoring the profound and often irreversible implications of such medical interventions on minors.
He claims most youth receiving gender-affirming care don't progress to surgery, but this glosses over the significant impact any form of such treatment can have on developing minds and bodies. His solution? Tinkering around the edges with administrative rules, like banning surgery for those under 18 and imposing reporting requirements – measures that fall woefully short of the robust protections the vetoed bill would have provided.
This isn't just about one bill; it's about a pattern of behavior from a governor who consistently fails to uphold the principles he was elected to defend. DeWine's squishiness isn't just a nuisance; it's a liability for Ohio's conservative movement. His actions contribute to the weakening of conservative governance and betray the trust of those who expected him to champion their values.
As other states take bold steps to protect their youth from premature and politicized medical decisions, DeWine's veto places Ohio on the wrong side of this critical issue. It's a stark reminder of the urgent need for true conservative leadership in Ohio – leadership that doesn't buckle under pressure or cave to the whims of progressive agendas.
In conclusion, Governor Mike DeWine's latest veto is a slap in the face to conservative Ohioans. His tenure as governor has been marked by a series of disappointments, underlining the necessity for Ohio to elect leaders who genuinely embody conservative values and have the courage to stand by them. DeWine’s governorship is a textbook example of RINO politics, and it's high time for Ohio to turn the page.
Return To Directory
MUST SEE PODCAST & STORY
Exposing Norm Eisen, the Mastermind Behind Anti-Trump Lawfare
The X-Space Series on Norm Eisen
Our latest X-Space series dives deep into the intricate web woven by Norm Eisen, a political strategist and former Obama administration official, who has emerged as a central figure in the orchestration of legal and media campaigns against former President Donald Trump. Eisen's extensive involvement in anti-Trump efforts is meticulously dissected, revealing the breadth and depth of his influence in shaping political narratives.
Key Highlights from the Series
Obama's Ethics Czar Turned Anti-Trump Operative: Norm Eisen, who served as the White House Ethics Czar under President Obama, has played a pivotal role in numerous campaigns against Trump, including the Russia collusion allegations and both of Trump's impeachments.
Founding of Key Election Groups: Eisen's role in founding the Voter Protection Program and States United, and his efforts to dissuade governors from deploying the National Guard during elections, underscores his strategic involvement in the 2020 election.
Expertise in "Color Revolutions" and Regime Change: The series explores Eisen's writings on color revolutions, particularly his book "The Democracy Playbook", which appears to serve as a blueprint for the tactics used against Trump. These include the impeachments, orchestrated protests, and amplification of election controversies.
Eisen's Central Role in January 6th Narratives: Eisen's name surfaces repeatedly in connection with various groups and documents related to the events of January 6th. The series delves into the possibility of Eisen using attorney-client privilege to conceal potentially illegal coordination between different anti-Trump factions.
A Key Player in the Censorship and Lawfare Cabal: Eisen's continued prominence in the anti-Trump infrastructure is a critical aspect of the series. The potential implications of exposing his role and challenging the attorney-client privilege he may have utilized could lead to significant revelations.
We strongly encourage our audience to explore this comprehensive two-part series on Norm Eisen in our X-Space platform. This in-depth analysis offers a rare glimpse into the mechanics of political lawfare and the manipulation of public opinion. By unveiling the tactics and strategies of a key anti-Trump figure, the series provides invaluable insights into the workings of political power plays and their impact on American democracy. Don't miss this crucial exploration of one of the most influential operatives in contemporary American politics.
READ THE NORM EISEN ARTICLE HERE
Return To Directory
